By Mark Skellum - Partner & Head of Haulage & Logistics

‍

The Two-Year Rule Behind the HGV Driver Shortage

The driver shortage gets discussed almost entirely as a labour-market problem. Pay too low, hours too long, parking too poor, image too tired. All of that is true and well rehearsed. But there is a more specific, more fixable, less talked-about mechanism quietly keeping the pipeline broken in 2026, and it sits within the insurance market rather than the labour market. In practice, this means the constraint is not willingness to do the job, but the conditions required to start doing it.

The Logistics Skills Network and Fueler Consulting published a joint investigation earlier this year that reviewed more than 4,600 active HGV vacancies on the main job boards. Only 10 to 15 percent openly welcomed newly qualified drivers. For Class 1 roles, the figure was 5 to 8 percent. The other 87 percent either explicitly excluded recently qualified candidates or were silent in a way the market reads as exclusion. In practice, that silence functions as a filter. The reason given, when one was given at all, was usually some variant of “two years’ experience required for insurance.”

That phrase is doing a great deal of work, and it deserves a closer look.

Where does the two-year rule actually come from?

The standard fleet motor policy and the agency negligence policy that sits behind temporary driving work both restrict or surcharge drivers with fewer than two years of licence experience. Some require 180 days in class. Some also require the driver to be over 21. A newly qualified driver, by definition, fails the first of these and often the others.

The result is that an operator considering hiring a fresh Class 1 holder has to make a phone call to their broker before they make a phone call to the candidate. If the candidate is taken on, the renewal premium for the whole fleet can rise by anywhere between 10 and 30 percent. A single avoidable claim during the first months can move that figure further. For a business operating on the kind of margin the Road Haulage Association reports for the sector, which has hovered around two percent and in some recent samples closer to 1.58 percent, that is not a marginal calculation.

So the operator says no, the candidate cannot start, and the experience the policy demands does not get built. At that point, hiring a newly qualified driver stops being a recruitment decision and becomes an insurance decision.

‍

hiring a newly qualified driver stops being a recruitment decision and becomes an insurance decision.

‍

Does the safety data justify the threshold?

This is the part of the conversation that gets least attention and is most worth pressing on. All-casualty figures for HGV-involved collisions in Great Britain fell by 49 percent between 2015 and 2023. The aggregate safety trend in the sector is sharply downward, on the official numbers.

Publicly available commercial driver telematics data often shows peak crash rates occurring at around 24 to 36 months of professional driving, rather than in the first year. However, that pattern is difficult to separate from how experience is accumulated in practice. Where newly qualified drivers are restricted or excluded in their first two years, their exposure to real-world conditions is reduced, and meaningful mileage is delayed. Risk may therefore be concentrated into the period when those restrictions lift, rather than indicating that later-stage drivers are inherently higher risk.

None of the major fleet insurers publishes claims data specific to newly qualified HGV drivers. The actuarial basis for the two-year rule, in other words, has not been tested in public against the safety record of the cohort it excludes. That is a striking position for a sector-wide constraint that is now the single most cited reason for the driver pipeline not filling.

Has policy tried to fix it?

The barrier has been named in parliamentary evidence nine times since 2016, by the trade press, by training providers, and by two government-commissioned research programmes. It was absent from every emergency intervention rolled out after the 2021 supply chain crisis, when the response was instead temporary visas, training subsidies and the Skills Bootcamps.

The Bootcamp programme produced two cohorts. The first drew career changers from outside the industry and qualified them into a freight market that promptly collapsed. The second worked better, because employers used the funding to upskill existing warehouse and back-office staff onto Class 2 and Class 1 licences. According to research figures cited in the Fueler report, employer-funded participants completed at 81 percent. Self-funded unemployed participants completed at 49 percent.

The Bootcamp funding is now winding down. The pipeline that did work is closing while the structural barrier that did not get touched is still in place. That sequencing is the issue.

What can the owner-managed haulier actually do?

For operators, this is not a policy debate to wait on. It is a constraint that can be managed at renewal.

This is where the operator has more room to move than the headline policy debate suggests.

The first is to challenge the broker. Premium uplifts of 10 to 30 percent for taking on a newly qualified driver are conventional, not contractual. Fleet policies can be structured to insure the vehicle rather than the individual, the way the German and Dutch markets do as standard. The named-driver model is not the only one available, and a broker who cannot quote against a fleet-based alternative is a broker due a competitive quote. The market is quietly differentiating on this, and the operators I have spoken with in the last few months who pushed hardest on it have come back with materially better terms than a standard renewal would have delivered.

The second is the supervised pairing model. The risk an insurer underwrites against newly qualified drivers is largely the risk of an early-mileage, unsupervised, unfamiliar-route incident. Operators who pair new drivers with experienced drivers for a defined number of weeks, evidence the supervision properly, and feed telematics data into the renewal conversation are presenting a different risk profile. Some brokers will respond to that. Those that do not are leaving business on the table. In effect, this brings forward safe experience-building rather than deferring it into the point of highest exposure.

The third is recruitment scope. Food distribution, waste management and construction-related deliveries have, on Fueler’s analysis, consistently kept the door open to newly qualified drivers, in part because the duty cycles and the local routing make the risk easier to manage and supervise. An operator outside those sub-sectors looking at the same candidate pool will benefit from understanding why those sectors are getting it to work.

The fourth is the existing workforce. The driver who is already in your yard, who has been on the desk, the warehouse, or the shunting tractor for years, and who would qualify for a Class 2 or Class 1 with structured support, is the candidate the system absorbs most easily. The Bootcamp data was unambiguous about that. The completion rate, the retention rate, and the insurance position were all better.

Where is this heading?

The structural drivers do not flatter the next decade. More than 117,000 qualified drivers let their Driver Qualification Cards lapse in the past twelve months, on the RHA’s own figures. More than half the active driver workforce is between 50 and 65. Fewer than two percent are under 24. The self-employed driver pool, which has historically given operators their surge capacity at peak, has fallen by 21 percent in 15 months. Taken together, these trends point to a system that is losing experienced drivers faster than it allows new ones to enter.

The sector is not short of people who want to do the job. It is short of a route through which people who have qualified to do the job can actually start doing it. Until the insurance question is engaged with directly, by operators in their broker conversations as much as by government in its policy ones, the shortage will keep being treated as a pay problem when the binding constraint is somewhere else entirely.

For an owner-managed haulier whose succession of drivers is starting to look thinner each year, that is not an abstract observation. It is a recruitment strategy that needs rewriting before the next renewal, not after it.

‍

If the next twelve months of hiring in your business hinges on how your fleet policy is structured, it is a conversation worth opening before renewal rather than at it. Our haulage and logistics team are happy to talk it through.

‍

‍

This article has been prepared for information purposes only. Formal professional advice is strongly recommended before making decisions on the topics discussed in this release. No responsibility for any loss to any person acting, or not acting, as a result of this release can be accepted by us, or any person affiliated with us.

‍

‍